Whether a state offense involving child pornography can serve as a predicate for federal sentencing enhancement under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(1) when the state statute's definition differs from federal law

QUESTION PRESENTED 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(1) imposes an increased mandatory minimum and maximum sentence on a defendant who “has a prior conviction . . . under the laws of any State relating to... the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography.” The question presented is: Whether the sentencing enhancement in Section 2252(b)(1) covers only convictions under state statutes that define “child pornography” in the same manner or more narrowly than federal law (as two circuits have concluded), or if instead the mandatory minimum reaches to include defendants convicted of state offenses that stretch beyond the federal definition of child pornography (as five circuits hold).