No. 24-27

Next Generation Technology, Inc., et al. v. Ur M. Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure de-novo-review district-court federal-magistrates-act federal-procedure judicial-review magistrate-judge subject-matter-jurisdiction waiver waiver-of-objections
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Waiver-of-subject-matter-jurisdiction

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Canarguments in support of a court’s subject-matter jurisdiction be waived? 2. The Federal Magistrates Act provides that a “judge of the [district] court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Does § 636(b)(1) permit a district court to find that a party has waived de novo review of an objection toamagistrate judge’s report and recommendations because the issue or argument was not first raised before the magistrate?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-01
Waiver of Ur M Jaddou, USCIS and Immigration services, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-01
Waiver of right of respondent Ur M Jaddou, USCIS and Immigration services, et al. to respond filed.
2024-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Next Generation Technology, Inc. , Puspita Deo
Khagendra D. Gharti ChhetryChhetry & Associates P.C, Petitioner
Khagendra D. Gharti ChhetryChhetry & Associates P.C, Petitioner
Judah Jacob ArielAriel Law, Petitioner
Judah Jacob ArielAriel Law, Petitioner
Ur M Jaddou, USCIS and Immigration services, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent