No. 24-302

Marcos Mendez v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: border-search cell-phone-search electronic-privacy fourth-amendment suspicionless-search warrantless-search
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Government may conduct a warrantless and suspicionless search of electronic contents of a person's cell phone at the border

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Government may conduct a warrantless search of the electronic contents of a person’s cell phone at the border. 2. Whether the Government may conduct a suspicionless search of the electronic contents of a person’s cell phone at the border. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS United States District Court (N.D. Il.) No. 16-cr-163 United States, Plaintiff v. Marcos Mendez, Defendant Judgment: Mar. 8, 2023 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit No. 23-1460 United States, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcos Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Opinion: June 10, 2024

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-10
2024-11-27
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 27, 2024.
2024-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2024 to November 27, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-09-27
Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2024)
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Marcos Mendez
Robert Joseph Lane RobertsonRobertson Duric, Petitioner
Robert Joseph Lane RobertsonRobertson Duric, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent