No. 24-339

Martin Akerman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure court-fee-waiver federal-employee-rights government-accountability userra-rights whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-01-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the whistleblower protection provisions of USERRA require waiver of court fees for federal employees engaged in protected whistleblowing activities?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED This case offers the Court a unique opportunity to examine the comprehensive mistreatment of a Department of Defense whistleblower, Martin Akerman, through each phase of the whistleblower protection and retaliation process. The Applicant's ~ experience spans the entire lifecycle of a whistleblower report—from filing with the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), engaging in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), and enduring retaliation ; under 50 U.S.C. § 3341(j), to the subsequent involvement of Congress, Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigations, and case handling by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). e Does the whistleblower protection provisions of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), as codified in 38 U.S.C. § 4311(b), require the waiver of court . fees for federal employees who engage in protected whistleblowing activities, aimed at protecting rights under USERRA's provisions?

Docket Entries

2025-01-21
Application (24A507) denied by the Court.
2024-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
2024-12-31
Application (24A507) referred to the Court.
2024-11-26
Application (24A507) refiled and submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2024-11-25
Application (24A507) denied by The Chief Justice.
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-18
Application (24A507) to suspend the effect of the denial of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2024-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board, et al. to respond filed.
2024-09-21
2024-09-21
Request for recusal received from petitioner.
2024-06-17
Application (23A1097) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 25, 2024.
2024-06-04
Application (23A1097) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 26, 2024 to September 25, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Martin Akerman
Martin Akerman — Petitioner
Martin Akerman — Petitioner
Merit Systems Protection Board, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent