No. 24-34

Ricky-Dean Horton v. PG&E Corporation

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 9th-circuit bankruptcy-court bankruptcy-procedure civil-procedure court-rules due-process judicial-discretion procedural-fairness statutory-interpretation substantive-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-11-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the proceedings in the U. S. Bankruptcy Court N.D. Cal. failed to follow the rules and procedures for a fair and just determination of Petitioner's case and claim?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is deemed to comprise every subsidiary question fairly included therein. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the proceedings in the U. S. Bankruptcy Court N.D. Cal. failed to follow the rules and procedures for a fair and just determination of Petitioner’s case and claim? 2. Whether the U. S, Bankruptcy Court N.D. Cal, and the U.S. District Court N.D. Cal., and the 9th Circuit Court used or abused the statutes, rules or procedures to abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of Petitioner? ii PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS I, Ricky Dean Horton am the Petitioner. I am, and was at all times, a living sovereign man with my home in Solano County, California. Respondents are PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Collectively, PG&E”).

Docket Entries

2024-11-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-29
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-25
Waiver of right of respondent PG & E Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2024-05-21

Attorneys

PG & E Corporation, et al.
Thomas B. RuppKeller Benvenutti Kim LLP, Respondent
Ricky-Dean Horton
Ricky-Dean Horton — Petitioner