Whether the failure of state and local officials to address election grievances violates a citizen's First Amendment right to petition the government for redress

Questions Presented 1. First Amendment Right to Petition: Does the failure of state and local officials to address and respond to legitimate election grievances constitute a violation of Beadles’ First Amendment right to petition the government for . . redress of grievances, thus undermining a fundamental constitutional protection essential to democratic governance? , 2. Pleading Standards and Rule 12(b)(5) Dismissal: Did the district court err in dismissing Beadles’ complaint under NRCP Rule 12(b)(5) when the complaint contained specific and detailed allegations that complied with the pleading standards set forth in NRCP Rule 8(a)(2), thus precluding a premature dismissal? | i SCOTUS RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE | . The undersigned, in proper person (Petitioner), certifies that the following are per‘ sons and entities as described in Rule 29.6 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, and must be disclosed. These representations are made in order that the Justices of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. There are no parent corporations or publicly held companies that own 10% or more of the Petitioner. The Petitioner is not using a pseudonym. Trad Sy DATED? 820/24 JL y Robert Beadles, Petitioner Court Proceedings : ROBERT BEADLES VS JAMIE RODRIGUEZ, ET AL-Washoe CountySecond Ju. dicial District-CV23-01341 Change Of Venue Granted on 9/22/23 BEADLES VS. RODRIGUEZ-Carson City First Judicial District 23 OC 00105 1B-10/20/23 Dismissed under NRCP Rule 12(b)(5) BEADLES VS. RODRIGUEZ-Nevada Supreme Court-876835/20/24 Affirmed Lower Court Decision-6/2 1/24 En Banc Reconsideration Denied iv