No. 24-348
Pamela D. Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: bankruptcy-settlement breast-implant-claims constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection payment-dispute
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a bankruptcy settlement involving Dow's $3.2 billion payment for breast implant claims violates due process and constitutional protections
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED: Was a Jury Trial Properly Denied Petitioner, and What Could a Jury Decide? A. Did Dow pay $3.2 Billion, as it agreed to pay? B. Should Dow be discharged in Bankruptcy, if it did not pay $3.2 Billion? C. Did the Opt-out Plaintiff get a chance to prove injury from Breast Implants? D. If Dow delayed payment for 30 years, can Plaintiff prove Dow paid nothing but E. Are there Constitutional 14th Amendment issues of “due process” and “equal protection, plus 5th Amendment “taking”?
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent DCC Litigation Facility, Inc to respond filed.
2024-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2024)
Attorneys
DCC Litigation Facility, Inc
Christian Charles Huffman — Garan Lucow Miller, P.C., Respondent
Christian Charles Huffman — Garan Lucow Miller, P.C., Respondent
Pamela Sutherland
James L Elsman Jr. — Elsman Law Firm, Petitioner
James L Elsman Jr. — Elsman Law Firm, Petitioner