Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and lower courts improperly ruled on a case involving alleged unconstitutional use of brain-computer interface and directed energy weapons

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. DO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PANELS’ (EN BANC) RULING, THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS’ ORIGINAL . RULING, AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA’S RULINGS CONFLICT WITH A ‘ DECISION(S) OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THEREBY CREATING NECESSARY REVIEW BY THE SUPREME COURT TO SECURE AND MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY OF THE COURT'S PRECEDENT? , B. DOES THE COURT'S ACTIVE INVOLVEMENT IN FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALING THE ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL USE OF ; ; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCT’) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (“DEW”) BY GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS, IN PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY UNITED STATES CITIZEN . AND CIVILIAN PLAINTIFF} RESULTING IN ONGOING CONTROL AND ATTACKS ON ‘SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE? Cc. IS IT AN ABUSE OF THE COURT'S SUA SPONTE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 12()(6) AND RULE 15(a) FOR A JUDGE VIA ISSUANCE OF A I SUA SPONTE ORDER(S)/RULING(S) TO INTENTIONALLY FRAUDULENTLY CONCEAL, THEREBY ACTIVELY INVOLVING THE COURTS IN AN ONGOING CONSPIRACY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS/ACTORS, INTENTIONALLY DONE BY THE COURT(S) TO CONCEAL COMPLETE OF SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS ENGAGED IN BY DEFENDANTS TO THE LAWSUIT IN QUESTION, NOT ONLY UPON PLAINTIFF BUT ON A VAST GROUP OF UNCONSENTING CIVILIANS DOMESTICALLY WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, VIA THE CONCEALED BCI DEW PROJECT DOMESTICALLY, IN WHICH THE COURTS ARE ; ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS, THE DEFENDANTS , NAMED TO THE LAWSUIT THEREBY COMMANDEERING THE COURT SYSTEM TO COVERTLY IMPLEMENT/FACILIATE THE COMPREHENSIVE BCI DEW SYSTEM WHILE USING THE COURTS TO FALSELY PUT FORTH THE IMAGE THAT A CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS STILL CONTROLLING RATHER THAN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES BEING VIA THE COMPREHENSIVE, CONCEALED BCI DEW, IN WHICH THE SAME BCI DEW ARE USED TO (VERY LITERALLY) REMOTELY, INTERACTIVELY X Il CONTROL THE MIND(S) AND BODY/IES (CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM(S)) OF PLAINTIFF AND OTHER UNCONSENTING US. CITIZENS/CIVILIANS DOMESTICALLY, THEREBY MAKING THE COURTS AN INSTRUMENTAL PART OF THE CONSPIRACY TO ACTIVELY CONCEAL AND FACILIATE THE ONGOING CONCEALED USE OF SAID BCI DEW TO STAGE/FABRICATE ENTIRELY FAKE TANGIBLE EVENTS IN THE LIVES OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS/CIVILIANS, STAGING ‘ARTIFICIAL REALITIES IN INDIVIDUALS’ . LIVES, INCLUSIVE OF (STAGED/FABRICATED) LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THOSE INDIVIDUALS’ LIVES? RULE 29.6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE . STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 29.6 of the Supreme Court Rules, Scott York states that he brings this appeal in his individual capacity and is not a non-governmental corporate party. 6