No. 24-37
Lorenzo Garod Pierre v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment as-applied-challenge constitutional-rights criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process federal-firearms-laws federal-law second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant may raise an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a criminal defendant may raise an asapplied Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1).
Docket Entries
2024-11-22
Judgment Issued.
2024-10-21
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-30
Reply of petitioner Lorenzo G. Pierre filed.(Distributed)
2024-09-16
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 16, 2024.
2024-08-08
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 15, 2024 to September 16, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
2024-05-30
Application (23A1068) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 10, 2024.
2024-05-25
Application (23A1068) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2024 to July 10, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Lorenzo Garod Pierre
Brian Taylor Goldman — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Petitioner
Brian Taylor Goldman — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent