No. 24-376
Brennaris Marquis Johnson v. Washington
Tags: fourteenth-amendment jury-finding reasonable-doubt sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment upward-departure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments require a jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravating facts amount to 'substantial and compelling reasons' for an upward departure from presumptive sentencing guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments require a jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more aggravating facts amount to “substantial and compelling reasons” for an upward departure from the presumptive range, as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under several states’ mandatory guidelines. ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2024)
2024-07-30
Application (24A100) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 5, 2024.
2024-07-23
Application (24A100) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2024 to October 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Brennaris Marquis Johnson
Christopher Mark Petroni — Washington Appellate Project, Petitioner