No. 24-401

Ashok Kumar Cheejati, et al. v. Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-procedure agency-action immigration-law judicial-review statutory-interpretation withholding-claims
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw HabeasCorpus Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) precludes judicial review of unlawful withholding claims and whether a statutory deadline is required to state a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether there is clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) to preclude judicial review of unlawful withholding claims? 2. Whether a statutory deadline is required to state a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) under the Administrative Procedure Act?

Docket Entries

2025-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
2024-12-12
Brief of Blinken, Sec. of State, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-12
Brief of respondents Blinken, Sec. of State, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2024.
2024-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2024 to December 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Ashok Cheejati, et al.
Bradley Bruce BaniasBanias Law, LLC, Petitioner
Steven Andrew BrownReddy Neumann Brown PC, Petitioner
Blinken, Sec. of State, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent