No. 24-401
Ashok Kumar Cheejati, et al. v. Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, et al.
Tags: administrative-procedure agency-action immigration-law judicial-review statutory-interpretation withholding-claims
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw HabeasCorpus Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw HabeasCorpus Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) precludes judicial review of unlawful withholding claims and whether a statutory deadline is required to state a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether there is clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) to preclude judicial review of unlawful withholding claims? 2. Whether a statutory deadline is required to state a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) under the Administrative Procedure Act?
Docket Entries
2025-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
2024-12-12
Brief of Blinken, Sec. of State, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-12
Brief of respondents Blinken, Sec. of State, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2024.
2024-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2024 to December 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Ashok Cheejati, et al.
Bradley Bruce Banias — Banias Law, LLC, Petitioner
Steven Andrew Brown — Reddy Neumann Brown PC, Petitioner
Blinken, Sec. of State, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent