No. 24-402
John Lugo v. Alan Burton, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights first-amendment loitering police-discretion public-space reasonable-restriction
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-12-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal appellate circuits are bound by Supreme Court precedent in determining the reasonableness of police officers' actions when restricting a citizen's right to loiter on public property
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. In determining whether a police officer acted reasonably in denying a citizen’s right to loiter on public property for innocent purposes protected by the Constitution such as videotaping, are Federal Appellate Circuits bound by Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87, 90 (1965): Chicago v. . Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999). i
Docket Entries
2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent Alan Burnie, et al. to respond filed.
2024-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Alan Burnie, et al.
Joseph Dennis Bracey Jr. — IFMK Law, Ltd., Respondent
John Lugo
John Lugo — Petitioner