No. 24-42
Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure corporate-assignment due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-interpretation legal-standing procedural-rules separation-of-powers standing unbiased-judiciary
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has F.R.Civ. P. been abrogated by judicial fiat?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | ; Has F.R.Civ. P. | been abrogated by judicial fiat? ll a Should the Rules Concerning Unpublished Opinions Be Rewritten and/or Modified? i . Do We Have a Government Of Laws And Not Of Men (or Women)? \V May A Corporation Assign Its Interest In A Lawsuit to a Non-Lawyer? . Vv . Did the District Court Subject Petitioner To A * ; ; Piecemeal Appeal? L Vi Should Plaintiff Have Been Granted Discovery? Vil ; Were The Sanctions Imposed Unreasonable? , Vill Was Petitioner Entitled To An Unbiased Judge?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-08
Waiver of right of respondents John King, Agnes King, Greg Centineo and Julie Natale to respond filed.
2024-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
Attorneys
John King, Agnes King, Greg Centineo and Julie Natale
Michael D. Lee — The Liles Firm, P.A., Respondent
Scott Meide
Scott Meide — Petitioner