Does the Department of Justice's policy of deferring election fraud investigations violate constitutional duties and warrant judicial intervention to protect the 2024 election?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Department of Justice's policy of deferring : investigations, as outlined in its Election Crimes ; ; Branch Memorandum (Eighth Edition, 2017), violate the Take Care Clause of Article II, Section 3, by abdicating its constitutional duty to enforce : federal election laws, and does this failure warrant immediate judicial intervention to prevent harm to the 2024 election? . 2. Under Ex parte Young, does this Court have the authority to issue an emergency injunction compelling the DOJ to investigate credible election fraud allegations, particularly where the DOJ’s misuse of prosecutorial discretion prevents judicial review of statutory violations and infringes on this Court’s ; : role in ensuring compliance with federal law? 3. Does this Court’s precedent in New Jersey v. New York justify the immediate appointment of a Special Master to oversee DOJ compliance with federal election laws, particularly in light of the’ . DOJ’s systemic misuse of prosecutorial discretion to defer investigations, which poses an imminent threat to the 2024 election? 4. Does the DOJ’s improper deferral of credible ~ : election fraud investigations violate Petitioners’ , Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection, warranting immediate judicial oversight to prevent irreparableharm , . and ensure the integrity of the 2024 election? ; ii 5. Does the DOJ’s systemic obstruction of election fraud investigations through improper prosecutorial ; discretion violate Petitioners’ First Amendment right ; , to petition the government for redress of grievances and justify immediate judicial intervention to protect ; the electoral process ahead of the 2024 election? ;