Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether diversity jurisdiction in the context of the Class Action Fairness Act may be established without ever identifying a diverse person or their state or country of citizenship. 2. Whether diversity jurisdiction under Article HII may be exercised without ever establishing personal jurisdiction over a diverse person. 3. Whether, under TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), jurisdiction may be predicated on injury-at-law under wrongful-death or survivorship statutes without showing Article III injury-in-fact. 4. Whether this Court should grant, vacate, and remand— depending upon this Court’s forthcoming decision in a case submitted for decision this term, Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger, No. 23-677.
2025-02-24
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc.</i> v. <i>Wullschleger</i>, 604 U. S. 22 (2025).
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-12-27
Brief of Netflix, Inc. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-27
Brief of respondent Netflix, Inc. in opposition filed.
2024-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2024.
2024-11-12
Motion of Netflix, Inc. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 27, 2024 to December 27, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-28
Response Requested. (Due November 27, 2024)
2024-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent Netflix, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2024)
2024-08-08
Application (24A149) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 14, 2024.
2024-08-05
Application (24A149) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2024 to October 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.