No. 24-458
Laurie Weinlein v. United States
Tags: criminal-sentencing ex-post-facto legislative-extension restitution retroactive-application victim-compensation
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the retroactive enlargement of a restitution liability period violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the retroactive enlargement of a restitution liability period violates the Ex Post Facto Clause
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-25
Reply of Laurie Weinlein submitted.
2025-02-25
Reply of petitioner Laurie Weinlein filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-12
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-02-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 12, 2025.
2024-12-16
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 13, 2025 to February 12, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2025.
2024-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2024 to January 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-13
Response Requested. (Due December 13, 2024)
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Laurie Weinlein
Michael B. Kimberly — McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent