Whether the Eleventh Circuit improperly applied state substantive law in a diversity jurisdiction case involving medical payments coverage by State Farm

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Didthe June 6, 2024, decision of the Eleventh Circuit fail to comply with the rule that a federal court, ina case in which jurisdiction is founded upon diversity of citizenship, is required to apply the substantive law of the state in which the action arose? 2. Does the decision of the Eleventh Circuit panel impermissibly allow State Farm to deny medical payments coverage, not only to Petitioner, but to perhaps thousands of other State Farm insureds who have incurred medical expenses in an auto accident? ti STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES « =Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Court of Cobb County, Georgia, No. 12-A-1738-2 (May 14, 2012) (Voluntarily Dismissed Feb. 10, 2021). « =Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, No. 1:21-CV-02376-ELR, 588 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 5, 2022). « =Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-12833 (April 18, 2023) (unpublished). « =Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, No. 1-21-CV-02376-ELR (N.D. Ga. Dec. 1, 2023). « =Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-14201 (11th Cir. June 6, 2024) (unpublished).