No. 24-5004

Joshua Mounts v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2024-07-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process expert-testimony expert-witnesses nazi-comparison personal-attacks prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether violations of the United States Constitution occur where defense experts are not allowed to respond to criticism of their expert reports and where prosecutors in closing arguments engage in personal attacks on defense experts, bolster the opinions of prosecution experts based on non-testifying experts supposedly agreeing with the prosecution experts, and accuse the defense experts of being like Nazis

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether violations of the United States Constitution occur where defense experts are not allowed to respond to criticism of their expert reports and where prosecutors in closing arguments engage in personal attacks on defense experts, bolster the opinions of prosecution experts based on non-testifying experts supposedly agreeing with the prosecution experts, and accuse the defense experts of being like Nazis. i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2024-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2024)

Attorneys

Joshua Mounts
Paul Croushore — Petitioner
Ohio
Ronald W. Springman Jr.Hamilton County Prosecutor Office, Respondent