No. 24-5006
Jason Steven Kokinda v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-u.s.c-2250 34-u.s.c-20913 change-of-residence chevron-deference criminal-procedure jury-instructions rule-of-lenity sex-offender-registration smart-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erroneously instructed the jury regarding a crucial element of the criminal offense of failure to register as a sex offender
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erroneously instructed the jury regarding a crucial element of the criminal offense of failure to register as a sex offender, 18 U.S.C. §2250, by defining “change of residence,” 34 U.S.C. §20913(c), in a way that enlarged the scope of conduct that would trigger a sex offender’s obligation to register, based on passages dispersed throughout the Attorney General’s so-called SMART Guidelines. i Il. LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2024-11-08
Judgment Issued.
2024-10-07
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Loper Bright Enterprises</i> v. <i>Raimondo</i>, 603 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-14
Supplemental Brief of Jason Kokinda submitted.
2024-08-14
Reply of petitioner Jason Kokinda filed.
2024-08-02
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2024)
Attorneys
Jason Kokinda
David W Frame — The Law Office of David Frame, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent