No. 24-5008

Glynzo Clark v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: burglary circuit-split criminal-law generic-burglary sentencing statutory-interpretation taylor-precedent taylor-v-united-states trespass
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Texas burglary, defined to include a trespass followed by the commission of a reckless crime, constitutes generic 'burglary' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)Gi) and Taylor v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether Texas burglary, defined to include a trespass followed by the commission of a reckless crime, constitutes generic “burglary” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)Gi) and Taylor v. United States. i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-11
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2024)

Attorneys

Glynzo Clark
Taylor Wills Edwards BrownFederal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
Taylor Wills Edwards BrownFederal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent