No. 24-5021

Joyce Isagba v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admissibility criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility federal-rules-of-evidence-404b fifth-amendment prior-bad-acts relevance rule-404b sentencing-conditions supervised-release
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a single uncharged act 5-7 years prior admissible under Rule 404(b)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED L Under Rule 404(b), Federal Rules of Evidence, is a single uncharged act occurring 5-7 year prior to the charged conduct in question, without any intervening act, relevant and admissible to prove the crime charged? Il. Under the Fifth Amendment, is a district court required to orally pronounce at sentencing all discretionary “standard conditions” of supervised release and to make an individualized assessment as to whether those conditions are reasonably related to the sentencing factors and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary under the circumstances? 1

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Joyce Isagba
Valarie LinnenAttorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent