No. 24-5026
Claudio Alvarez Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: 8-usc-1326 constitutional-law discriminatory-effect discriminatory-purpose equal-protection fifth-amendment illegal-reentry racial-discrimination statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the illegal re-entry statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326, violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment because the law was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose and it has had a discriminatory effect in practice.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the illegal re-entry statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326, violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment because the law was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose and it has had a discriminatory effect in practice.
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Claudio Alvarez Rodriguez
Patrick L. Bryant — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Patrick L. Bryant — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent