No. 24-5027
Jovan Marquis Harris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burrage-v-united-states causation-of-harm criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-distribution evidentiary-hearing federal-statute heroin-distribution jury-instruction jury-instructions overdose sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court err when it refused to instruct the jury that the heroin distributed by the defendant was the same heroin that caused the victims' overdoses?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the trial court err when it refused to instruct the jury that the heroin distributed by the defendant was the same heroin that caused the victims' overdoses in violation of this Court's precedent in Burrage v. United States? '. 2, Did the District Court err when it refused to grant Harris an evidentiary hearing in accord with 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) as there was a contested issue of material fact that would have entitled Harris to relief? ;
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
2024-04-26
Application (23A963) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until June 21, 2024.
2024-04-18
Application (23A963) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 22, 2024 to June 21, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent