No. 24-5044

In Re David Brian Derringer

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-misconduct obstruction-of-justice rico civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : multiple felonies per horse of exclusive personal property, and terrorize Derringer misusing power in the courts to obstruct, and facilitate the enemy invasion of the Mexico National Sinaloa Cartel and 170 + other countries to destroy America, and deny by illegal Order for Derringer not to be able to use the United States Courts in present ongoing already won 18 cases by Default and prohibited any future use of the Courts under threats of jail and assassination? 2) Can a judge Order a US American citizen not to file pleadings in order to specifically block the pro-se plaintiff's due process and equal protection and block appeals, from legally suing Defendants and invading Sinaloa Cartel that the judge or political party prefers to protect, Order the court clerk to discriminate and not do mandated ministerial acts to take filings from a selected targeted pro-se litigant, Order not to use the US Courts, Order not to file any future lawsuits, Complaints, pleadings, notices or any court papers, to protect parties known to commit ' crimes and torts against the Plaintiff, Order not to represent himself pro-se in US Courts, Order a mandate to have an attorney, spontaneously dismiss entire law suit complaints denying all due process, Order a limit and censor pleading writings of facts and truth under Rule 90 that expose the public and juridical corruption, and never grant Default Judgments to a pro-se Plaintiff when ; the Judge has had ex-parte communications with Defendants advising they don’t have to Answer the Complaint, as the case will be rigged to protect them? 3) As in the 19" and 20" century and prior, stealing ONE horse was a high crime punished by death by hanging, wherein is it now that government or anyone can steal 792 + Derringer horses of value $79,200,000.00 and get away with this due to protection of judges and other law enforcement deliberately allowing the NMLB to act without authority and jurisdiction in RICO racketeering horse rustling, stealing without forfeiture, warrant, due process, equal protection and then, in only 15 days, illegally sell the stolen personal property for millions in profit, b (NMSA 30-16-11) defeating the 5" Amendment and 42 USC 1982, and Jones v. Mayer Co., U.S. Supreme Court 392 U.S. 409 (1968) No. 645, and not be punished or held accountable for deliberately killing Plaintiff's hundreds of horses for profit selling them to be butchered for meat (NMSA 30-18-1(E)) and, not be mandated to return all horses under law (NMSA 29-1-2), with extreme monetary penalties, return all money gained in the illegal sales as felonies (NMSA 30-16-11) with no false claims of set-offs of transportation or feeding (extortion) and massively ; : punished for horses sold to killers, taken to Mexico to be slaughtered for meat and illegally gelded and illegally branded against the owner's wishes? : 4) Whether the NM State and Federal Courts can criminally Order a US citizen not to file pleadings or represent himself, which violates US Code Title 18 Sections 241, 242, 1503, 1505, _ RICO, TREASON 2381, 2382, 2383, 3617, and the 1%, 4", 5", 8, 13", 14, Amendments, with : all participating parties of Judges and Justices in violation of the 14'* Amendment Section 3, ; perjury of Oath, discharge of Canon, Code of Judicial Conduct and other egregious acts, to : deliberately violate the Supremacy Clause Constitution Article VI, maliciously with deliberate ; intent to destroy all rule of law in defeating the United States Constitution Article Ill, wherein all New Mexico Courts have singled-out and targeted "Whistleblower" citizen David Derringer in denial of all rights to due process and equal protection, denying mandated won default judgments in 18 cases, obstructing appeals, denying hearings, holding conspiratory hearings against the Plaintiff ex-parte, denying paid-for jury, denying notices of appeal, and all court denials are done without stated reasons or authorities in: No. S-l-SC-39680, Cou

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2024)

Attorneys

Derringer, In Re David
David Brian Derringer — Petitioner
David Brian Derringer — Petitioner