No. 24-5045
Charles N. Belssner v. Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct judicial-review legal-procedure nrs-enforcement standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1) 6/21/ 2$: : SHOULD ACT(S) OF WILFULL NEGLLIGEENCE ‘SHOULD BE . ) . STRICKEN WHEN THE PRESIDING JUDGE STATED ON RECORD: , . ; "HARMFUL ENVINOMENT TO BELIVING IN" MARGH 14, 2623 PAGe 23, Line 1-6 2/ 7/2pay SEE KING REMOVAAL OF JUDGE FOR “FAILURRE TO ENFORCCE NRS 38.310°WHICH RELLEVE OF HARM" THEREBY KEEPINS ALL CLAIMS IMTACT & WHOLE : . ; IS THIS NOT ABUSE OF DISCRETION? , ° es, ne ames we. wee lawn. i oe . : Seeamneen i We es ete cece anne cope ohana, — tee eee ee
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al. to respond filed.
2024-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al.
Todd W. Prall — Hutchinson & Steffen, PLLC, Respondent
Charles N. Belssner
Charles N. Belssner — Petitioner