was-defendant-prejudiced-and-denied-his-constitutional-right-to-the-effective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. Was Defendant 'Prejudiced' And Denied His Constitutional Right To The Effective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel On [Direct-Appeal] For Failing To Raise A Plain And Obvious [Trial Court Error, Where The [State Concedes], And The [Appellate Court Agree's] That The T#ial Court Made A Plain And Obvious [Trial Court Error] Pursuant To Illinois Supreme Court Rule 431(b) To Identify And Prevent [From Serving On The Jury] Any Potential Juror Who Is "Prejudiced" Against The "Bedrock Principles Of Anglo-American Criminal Law", Where The Trial Court's Failure To Strickly Comply With Rule 431(b) Threatens The Integrity Of, And Casts Doubt On, The Fundamental Fairness Of The Entire Trial Process? -ii .