Question not identified

No question identified. : mS QUESTIONS 1 WHETHER WAIVING JURY TRIAL IS CONSTITUIONAL UNDER THE 67! AMENDMENT, WHEN THE 67 AMENDMENT DID NOT SECURE TRIAL BY JURY AS A RIGHT, WHICH CONSEQUENTLY CAN BE WAIVED. 2 WHERE AND WHEN DID THE CONSTITUION SECURED TO MILITARY ACCUSED A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A COURT MARTIAL, SUBSEQUENTLY ALLOWING WAIVER OF HIS RIGHTS; 5T™ RIGHT TO SELF INCRIMINATION, 6™ RIGHT TO CONFRONT ACCUSORS, WHICH ARE BEING WAIVED BY A COURT WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE COURT MARTIAL. 3 WHETHER THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND AWARD RELEIF PURSUANT TO A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES UNDER THE 157 AMENDMENT. RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES 4 WHETHER THERE WAS AN IMPROPER COERCISION OR IMPROPER INDUCEMENT OF WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WHEN ACCUSED WAS LED TO BELIEVE HE IS WAIVING A CONSTITUIONAL RIGHT TO GENERAL COURT MARTIAL, WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A COURT MARTIAL IN THE CONSTITUTION. PAGE B