No. 24-5053

Patrick Keith Hirt v. Amber Sundquist, Superintendent, Deer Ridge Correctional Institution

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2024-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts bounds-v-smith constitutional-provisions habeas-corpus lewis-v-casey prison-officials prisoners-rights procedural-default supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State of Oregon violate this Court's holdings in Bounds v. Smith and Lewis v. Casey when prison officials impeded access to courts and proximately caused petitioner procedural default and dismissal of a habeas corpus petition?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the State of Oregon violate this Court’s holdings in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 and Lewis v. Casey, 518 U'S. 348, when prison officials impeded access to courts and proximately caused petitioner procedural default and dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus in an initialreview collateral proceeding where there was no counsel? 2

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent Amber Sundquist to respond filed.
2024-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Amber Sundquist
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Patrick K. Hirt
Patrick Keith Hirt — Petitioner
Patrick Keith Hirt — Petitioner