No. 24-5066
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-counsel constitutional-amendment constitutional-claims criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel public-defender speedy-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
speedy-trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION(s) PROPOSED Mr. McElroy respectfully asks: 1. Does 18 U.S.CA. § 3161, (speedy trial, apply to all state(s) within the Union, through the United States Constitution, Article III, cl. 2, § 3 and/or Amendment(s) V, and/or VI, and/or IX, and/or XIV? 2. Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals obstruct my public defender and/or create an impediment which barred my public defender from filing Constitutional claim(s) within my direct appeal? — 3. Was appellate counsel constitutionally ineffective through my direct appeal, pursuant to the standards of United States vs. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984)?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)