No. 24-5070

Javaris Marquez Tubbs v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment birth-certificate citizenship-status civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction legal-classification national-identity sentencing state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-04-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the sentence imposed in violation of the constitution or laws of the United States?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was the ‘sentence imposed in violation of the constitutipn or laws|of the United States? 2. Is the U.S. District Court for the Western Distkidt of ; Louitiana, Monroe Division, ordained and estezblished by a ct of Congress at Article III te act judicially? 3. s the U.S. District Court. of Western Louisiana, omroe Division, a "District Court of the United States"? 4. Did the U.S. District Court have jurisdiction toa impase| such sentence? 5. Did the U.S. District lack subject matter jurisdiction? : 6. Did the U.S. District Court lack In Personam jurisdiction? 7. Did the U.S. District Court leck Territorial jurisdiction? 8. as affiant arbitrarily deprived cf right to a name and nationality under ‘color’ of law? So, ' §,. |fs the United States of Ameriéalé.: claim of ersonam jurisdiction of affiant via 'state birth certificate’, oof of "Den tionalizatiou', ‘crimes egainst humanity’, ‘Genocide’? 10. Es the Moorish Divine and National movement of the worlds legal notice / judicial notice; mame declaration; proclamation; correction; Nunc Pro. Tunc to affiants right to a nam nd a nationality; cultural; political ‘status' of choice? ll. Pid the plaintiff and the district court judge conspire| against affiants rights by claiming jurisdiction (U.S. Citizenry} via . ‘birth certificate? 12, Did the plaintiff and the district court judge deprive | afifiant of rights under ‘color’ of law? . 13. Was there a ‘conflict of identity’, and of nationality on the part|of the plaintiff and the judge? 14. Can affiant be compelled to associate? 15. [Does affiant as a ‘Natural Person’ have the right o| self autonomy, self goverance, and to determine his own ‘poliltical status" of the "state"? 16. Are the right to travel, the right to mode cf conveyancel, the : right to lecomotion, the right to free movement, all absolute rights? ; | . ‘ _ QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 17. Is the "Birth Certificate’ a state deed of ownership? 18. Are the judges, senators, representatives, and members of the several state legislators, all executive, ‘and judicial officers both) of the united states and several states, bound by |Oath or Affirmation to Article VI of the U.S. Republic Constitution 19. [Is the (Treaty of Marrakech), the Treaty of peace and friendship between Morocco and the United States supreme) law of the Land? 20. j|Are treaties, including United Nation Charters, ‘Sup . Law of the Land? : . 21. [s "black’* a “color or race"? 22. Is ‘black' a nationality or a political slave label? 23. Are the labels negro, black, colored, african-american, |etc., an act of ‘denationalization' or ‘genocide’? ' 24, Does the birth certificate confer jurisdiction to the state? 25. Do #11 individuals have the right to a name and nationality? 26. Does 'status' determine jurisdiction? 27. |Is the Moorish Divine and National Movement, legal / judicial notice; name declaration; correction; proclamation and pubijcdtion; a name change or 4 status correction? . 28. |Is Article I of the U.S. Republic Constitution, 3/5] of all other 'persons' clause retroactively applied ex post facto} to the all fpersons' born 14th amendment ‘citizen'? . 29. Poes the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution, 'all| persons bornf clause holé Moorish Nationals hostage under ex post |facto slave labels e.g. negro, black, colored, african-american,| etc? 30. [fs the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution ex post |facto to the 13th amendmefit, reinstituting slavery via the black] code laws? 31. Has Dred Scott v. Sandford 15 L.Ed. 691, 19 How 393, eye been overturned? : 32, lAre negroes, blacks, coloreds, african-americans, ‘citizens’ according to the U.S. Republic constitution, and meaning and dntent of framing founding fathers? . | _ QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 33. Does the birth certificate declare negroes, blacks, coloreds, afridan-americans, as 'property' (subjects), via the state wherein they |reside? Is the ‘state seal' on the birth certificat rook . of claim? , 34. How is it a negro, b

Docket Entries

2025-04-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2024-10-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Javaris Marquez Tubbs
Javaris Marquez Tubbs — Petitioner
Javaris Marquez Tubbs — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent