No. 24-5072

Juan Rangel-Rubio v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge equal-protection juror-discrimination jury-selection peremptory-strike race-neutral-reasons voir-dire
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district courts err in denying Mr. Rangel-Rubio's Batson challenge to the government's peremptory strike of juror number 31?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the district courts dearly err by denying Mr.Rangel-Rubio's Batson Challenge to the government's peremptory strike of juror number 31 where the government raceneutral reasons included that the potential juror was not attentive during voir dire? Also, where the government did not use its Last Strict thus allowing other minorities to remain on the jury panel? |

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Juan Rangel-Rubio
Juan Rangel-Rubio — Petitioner
Juan Rangel-Rubio — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent