Have the federal courts misinterpreted and misapplied 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq. to encompass conduct neither proscribed nor enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq.?

Questions Presented ; 1. (Brief explanation of question] A defendant who him : : or herself alone engages in sexually explicit conduct without a minor's engagement is indicted for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). oe Question: Have the federal courts misinterpreted and misapplied 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq. to en LTTE eres oom, Got es CNEOMpass. conduct neither proscribed: nor’ énutierated 7-7 in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq.? , 2. (Brief explanation of question] A defendant stipulates to a stipulated offense conduct (as if he or she were convicted of the other offense) in a plea agreement. Subsequent to this, there is a © change in law. Question: Can a stipulation to a stipulated offense conduct in a plea agreement remain : ‘ ° enforceable after a change in law? vO : : ; 1