Whether prosecutors and Petitioner's pretrial sheriff's department Custodians violation of a Scheduled trial by jury, which in all likelihood may have resulted in acquittal in a capital first degree murder Charge, Should toll AED PA'oneyear limitation period for Filing 28U5C § 2254 factual innocence Claim?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1 Whether prosecutors and Petitioner's pretrial sheriff's department Custodians violation of a Scheduled trial by jury, which in all likelihood may have resulted in acquittal in a capital first degree murder Charge, Should toll AED PA‘oneyear limitation period for Filing 28U5C § 2254 factual innocence Claim? 2. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in agreement with dist rict court’s dental of Petitioner's Application for CertiFicate of Appealabilrty ¢ 3 Whether the Sixth Circust erred in agreement with the district Courts rigid enforcement the one-yeor statute of limitations in Summarily denying to hear constitutional grounds raised in States prisoner pro se petitlon for habeas Corpus relief? : 4. Whether district court erred in Failing to take into ) account trial lawyer's express Conflict of interest undisclosed that resulted in a fundamental miscarriage of justice in ‘State Proceedings? , "Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ()