No. 24-5095
Moises Gamboa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts improperly interpret United States Sentencing Guideline § 4C1.1 that violated the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . ; * DID THE LOWER COURTS IMPROPERLY INTERPRET UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINE § 4C1.1 THAT VIOLATED THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT : CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES? * DID THE LOWER COURTS DECISION CONTRADICT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLES OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR, STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION, AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION? , i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent