No. 24-5097

Richard Dzionara-Norsen v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure-due-process,criminal-procedure-
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether Petitioner’s conviction is supported by sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? 2. A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether Petitioner’s right to present a defense was violated by the district court’s denial of his requests to present expert witnesses regarding his fragile mental health and its effects on his interactions with law enforcement? 3. A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether the district court erred in denying Petitioner’s motion to suppress his statements and the contents of a computer seized by law enforcement agents? 4. A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether the district court erred in amending Counts Two and Three of the indictment in his final charge to the jury?

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-10-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2024)

Attorneys

Richard Dzionara-Norsen
Jillian Spitzer HarringtonJillian S. Harrington, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent