No. 24-510

Kevin Abbey, et al. v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: federal-tort-claims-act misrepresentation negligence-claims sovereign-immunity subject-matter-jurisdiction toxic-exposure
Key Terms:
Environmental Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-03-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioners' negligence claims 'aris[e] out of … misrepresentation,' and thus are barred by section 2680(h) of the FTCA, even though Petitioners did not personally rely on an alleged misrepresentation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioners are active and former San Francisco Police Department employees and their family members. They suffer from cancer and numerous ailments caused by exposure to toxic and radioactive materials the government knowingly released at a Naval shipyard in San Francisco Bay. Petitioners sued the government for negligence. In the decision below, the Ninth Circuit held that all the Petitioners lack subject matter jurisdiction for all their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), which waives the federal government’s sovereign immunity from civil tort actions but excludes from that waiver claims “arising out of” various intentional torts including 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2680(h). The question presented is: Whether Petitioners’ negligence claims “aris[e] out of ... misrepresentation,” and thus are barred by section 2680(h) of the FTCA, even though Petitioners did not personally rely on an alleged misrepresentation. ce)

Docket Entries

2025-03-31
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-11
Reply of Kevin Abbey, et al. submitted.
2025-03-11
2025-02-20
Brief of United States, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-02-20
Brief of respondents United States, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-12-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 20, 2025.
2024-12-23
Motion of United States, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2025 to February 20, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2025.
2024-11-13
Motion of United States, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 5, 2024 to January 6, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-01

Attorneys

Kevin Abbey, et al.
Charles Luther McCloudWilliams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
Charles Luther McCloudWilliams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
United States, et al.
Curtis E. Gannon — Respondent
Curtis E. GannonDeputy Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent