Terrance Nathaniel Brown, Jr. v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the statutory sentence be based on marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) and that the sentencing court erred in imposing a sentence above the statutory maximum
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the general verdict required that the statutory sentence be based on marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) and that the sentencing court erred in imposing a sentence above the statutory maximum. B. | Whether Brown’s right to due process and a jury trial was violated when the court increased Brown’s sentence based on conduct Brown was acquitted of committing after a jury trial. i