No. 24-5118
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process expert-testimony medical-examiner precedent remand sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where the State used a surrogate medical examiner to opine as to the cause of death in a murder trial, should the Court GVR this matter in light of the Court's recent decision in Smith v. Arizona, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2712 (June 21, 2024)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Where the State used a surrogate medical examiner to opine as to the cause of death in a murder trial, should the Court GVR this matter in light of the Court’s recent decision in Smith v. Arizona, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2712 (June 21, 2024)? ii PARTIES Petitioner: Jared Holton Seavey Respondent: The State of Texas
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Judgment and Mandate Issued.
2024-10-15
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Smith</i> v. <i>Arizona</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-10
Brief of Texas in opposition submitted.
2024-09-10
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2024-08-20
Response Requested. (Due September 19, 2024)
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-08
Waiver of Texas of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2024-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Jared Seavey
William Reynolds Biggs — WILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
Texas
Anne Grady — Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney, Respondent