Questions 1 - Can a Motion for New Trial or for Damages, or change of
Judgement after Remititur case be denied review by Superior Court for
a case ruled in Court of Appeal with no Remand for Damages to each
their own costs but also ruled legal entitlement to a probationary status
for a public employee and claimed non-appealable by the Court of
Appeal and is that a violation of ones right to Due Process, and equal
protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment based on the New
Evidence for the ruled Misclassfication?

QUESTION 2 - Would a ruling by a Court of Appeal Decision on a
Misclassfication of a public employee of Probationary status be
considered New Evidence and thus be under
a Motion for Review and would that trump the Ruling that fails to have a
Remand or Remetiter to the Superior Court

QUESTION 3 - Would the Court of Appeals original Decision
that did not address damages but did address
Misclassfication as a Probationary Teacher not a Substitute
prevent a Motion on Damages or new evidence from being
heard? Can the Sueprior Court refuse to hear a Motion
because no damages were mentioned in the Decision but
only each party pays its own costs?

Due-process