Rebecca Wu v. Twin Rivers Unified School District
DueProcess FourthAmendment LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Due-process
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Questions 1 Can a Motion for New Trial or for Damages, or change of Judgement after Remititur case be denied review by Superior Court for a case ruled in Court of Appeal with no Remand for Damages to each their own costs but also ruled legal entitlement to a probationary status for a public employee and claimed non-appealable by the Court of Appeal and is that a violation of ones right to Due Process, and equal protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment based on the New Evidence for the ruled Misclassfication? QUESTION 2 Would a ruling by a Court of Appeal Decision on a Misclassfication of a public employee of Probationary status be considered New Evidence and thus be under a Motion for Review and would that trump the Ruling that fails to have a Remand or Remetiter to the Superior Court QUESTION 3 Would the Court of Appeals original Decision that did not address damages but did address Misclassfication as a Probationary Teacher not a Substitute prevent a Motion on Damages or new evidence from being heard? Can the Sueprior Court refuse to hear a Motion because no damages were mentioned in the Decision but only each party pays its own costs? ue