Whether the district court's actions in this § 2254 habeas case sanctioned a departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the TCircuit has sanctioned so tae a departure trom the aceepled and usual course of judicial proceedings by the Northern District of tHlincis se as fo call fon an exer’ cise of this Counts supervisery power is this $ 2254 habeas case where tle distlet court, axtfer finding that the state post conviction court prosecutor (SASA") and public defender inordinately and unjustifiably dlelayed the post conviction case with their concectad effeets to conceal the grossly materfally, falsified trial transcript trom the Stade Cours and Stale autorities 5 and offer the Stak tue conceded the faelual and legal suffic iencies of te record based habeas claims, He distied court-refased 4 adjudicate the actual Claims, issues, and de fiases Las 4 both He substantive haheas claims and again fo the 6OCb) motion's procedural defects), and ins}ead inveeded all~new fake claims, evidence, and defenses 4 decide in favor of the Stele, and reflesed fo led me object live or even cule on my weitler objections , thick vely stleneiag me aud of court 5 and He 2 Circuit repeatedly cellised Cob trcates A Appealability based sokely on these false merits 5 and whieh district courts act ons very effectively continued the crimina! cover-up of the ASAS and court reporter ecefmes G Falsifying He fetal traaseiph) from the public and law entoreement authorities, hy the same district J4dge whe found the ASAS anel court ceporter's colmes inordinate and unjusti free ia the First places {leaving my actual bq b< 9; TIT <<. Jenled : without actual adjudication. ; ; * . Gd , ,