Diana Ingrid Reismann Sexton v. Fort Bend County, Texas, et al.
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
May-a-case-demanding-relief-to-a-dual-citizen-with-dominant-nationality-as-an-alien-and-her-child-injured-by-US-naturals-who-committed-tortures-fraud-and-violations-of-international-treaties
No question identified. : gs — 2 II. QUESTIONS OF THE CASE 1) May a case demanding relief to a dual citizen with dominant nationality as an alien and her child, injured by US naturals who committed tortures, fraud and violations of international treaties such as the Convention Against Torture, Tortures under U.S.C.18 §2340A, Alien Tort statue 28 U.S.C. § 1350, violation of the Vienna Convention, Monell U.S.C. 18 §1983, Qui Tam claims 18 U.S.C. § 286, 18 U.S.C. § 287, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq; when the cruel and unusual punishment was committed by more than twenty-one Fort Bend County employees into an extraterritorial jurisdiction of Houston area, without a clear government, be partially ‘ dismissed for sovereign immunity after the County Court produced a tampered a court order and fraudulent proceeding? 2) Is United States considered a foreign state under international treaties and U.S.C. 28 § 1605-1607 in the case of a legal migrant from other nation who is tortured, deprived of her own child and property by U.S. naturals government employees, right after a legal ; migrant naturalized in the receiving nation but remains dual citizen with dominant nationality as an alien? 3) Can an Associate Judge of a County hear a case when United States committed a jus cogens to be elicit a violation of international rights to the UN Convention Against Torture for abusive and fraudulent actions against both jus soli of other nation by Fort Bend County, Texas government employees, or the case it should be transferred to Federal Court? q 4 IV.