No. 24-5142
Thomas E. Creech v. Tim Richardson, Warden
IFP
Tags: circuit-split competency-to-be-executed death-penalty federal-courts federal-procedure habeas-corpus late-evolving-facts second-or-successive-petition statutory-interpretation successive-petitions
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a federal habeas petition based on late-evolving facts second or successive when it is not based on a claim that the inmate is incompetent to be executed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is a federal habeas petition based on late-evolving facts second or successive when it is not based on a claim that the inmate is incompetent to be executed? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI — Page i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-11
Reply of Thomas Creech submitted.
2024-09-11
Reply of petitioner Thomas Creech filed. (Distributed)
2024-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-19
Brief of respondent Tim Richardson in opposition filed.
2024-08-16
Brief of Tim Richardson in opposition submitted.
2024-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2024)
2024-05-09
Application (23A999) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 23, 2024.
2024-05-07
Application (23A999) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2024 to July 23, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Thomas Creech
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Tim Richardson
L. LaMont Anderson — Idaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent