No. 24-5148

Alexander Harvin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts assignment-of-security-deed civil-rights-violation due-process equal-protection foreclosure-challenge pro-se-litigation res-judicata standing
Latest Conference: 2024-11-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. The first question presented is could the Petitioner have raised the issue of wrongful / illegal foreclosure in the 2014 court proceedings?

2. The second question presented is whether the application of O. C. G. A.§ 9*2*20 by Georgia 's state and federal judges acting under color of law deny homeowners their constitutional rights to Due Process and Equal Protection of law?

3. The third and final question presented is when the state or federal court applies O. C. G. A. § 9*2*20, and halt discovery, is this a violation of the constitutional right to unhindered access to the courts?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Could the Petitioner have raised the issue of wrongful/illegal foreclosure in the 2014 court proceedings?

Docket Entries

2024-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-04
Supplemental brief to petition for rehearing from petitioner Alexander Harvin filed. (Distributed)
2024-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-27
Supplemental brief of petitioner Alexander Harvin filed.
2024-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Alexander Harvin
Alexander Harvin — Petitioner
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
William Reese Willis IIIAldridge Pite, LLP, Respondent