No. 24-5150

Toyrieon Sessions v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: Due-Process fourth-amendment law-enforcement mobile-device Mobile-Devices Probable-Cause Riley-v-California search-and-seizure Seizure warrant-requirement Warrantless-Search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Fourth-Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Following Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), may law enforcement seize a person’s mobile telephone—without probable cause and without a warrant—and hold it for nearly one year until they develop probable cause to then seek a warrant? i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States v. Sessions, Case No. 2:17-cr-00767-AB-3, Central District of California (Birotte, J.). Judgment entered May 11, 2021. Docket Entry 311. United States v. Sessions, Case No. 21-50125, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Memorandum disposition filed January 18, 2024 at Docket Entry 59; see also Pet. Appx. ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-01
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Toyrieon Sessions
Ethan Atticus BaloghBalogh & Co. APC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent