Where the Assistant United States Attorney's representing the Government violates a standard announced in Napue v. Illinois by gaining a criminal conviction by knowingly using false evidence and false testimony, under what circumstances should the conviction be upheld at the cost of denying inalienable rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution?

Question Presented oS Where the Assistant United States Attorney's representing the ‘ Government violates a standard announced in Napue v. Illinois by gaining a criminal conviction by knowingly using false evidence and false testimony, under what circumstances should the conviction be upheld at the cost of denying inalienable rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution? ; _ ; . — t’ a a .