No. 24-5176
Antonio Santonastaso v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1001 criminal-law false-statements federal-prosecution judicial-review jurisdiction maslenjak-v-united-states materiality materiality-standard statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the new materiality standard from Maslenjak v. United States apply to prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Section 1001(a)(2) of title 18 only criminalizes the making of material false statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of the United States government. In light of this Court’s redefinition of materiality for 8 U.S.C. § 1425(a) prosecutions in Maslenjak v. United States, 582 U.S. 335 (2017), does this new materiality standard also apply in prosecutions under § 1001(a)(2)? 2
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Antonio Santonastaso
Jin-Ho King — Milligan Rona Duran & King LLC, Petitioner
Jin-Ho King — Milligan Rona Duran & King LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent