No. 24-5188
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-trials non-unanimous-jury second-degree-murder sixth-amendment state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether non-unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal trials violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. As there are conflicting decisions amongst state courts of last resort concerning a constitutional issue, in accordance with Rule X(b), this matter is now ripe for review from this Honorable Court. Patrick #575562\ilson Patrick ushabwrt,wat.odt Patrick Wiison v. Tim Hooper, Warden i. 4 cS
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2024-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Jorge Benjamin Aguinaga — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
Jorge Benjamin Aguinaga — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent