No. 24-519
Eunice Bisong Nkongho v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: border-search criminal-investigation electronic-media fourth-amendment law-enforcement search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the border exception to the Fourth Amendment allows warrantless seizure and search of electronic media for criminal investigation purposes, and whether the delay in obtaining a search warrant is unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the scope of the border exception to the Fourth Amendment extends to a seizure and search for information about a crime? II. Whether the delay in obtaining a search warrant is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment and not saved by the good faith exception where the reason for the delay is that law enforcement did not want to create precedent requiring a warrant every time there is a search of electronic media that is seized at the border?
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2024)
Attorneys
Eunice Bisong Nkongho
Robert Charles Bonsib — Marcus & Bonsib, LL C, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent