No. 24-5199

Sharon Cammille Riddick v. Massachusetts

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2024-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: dismissal due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment interlocutory-appeal obstruction-of-justice petition-government self-incrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 8.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2) is an adequate basis to dismiss the Petitioner's Complaint, and not a violation of the Petitioner's First Amendment right to petition the government to redress grievances clause, as well as the Fifth Amendment the right to self incrimination and due process clauses?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

questions presented are (1). Whether 8.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2), as amended, 434 Mass. 1801 (2001) is an adequate basis to dismiss the Petitioner’s Complaint, and not a violation of the Petitioner’s First Amendment right to petition the government to redress grievances clause, as well as the Fifth Amendment the right to self incrimination and due process clauses? ‘ (2).Whether dismissing and not enforcing Petitioner's . M.G.L., CH2, SEC.11, SEC.5 Interlocutory Appeal Into Single Justice, is an act of obstruction of justice by suppression of the Petitioner’s Court filings, a violation of the Petitioner’s Fourteenth Amendment due process clause? ;

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)

Attorneys

Sharon Cammille Riddick
Sharon Riddick — Petitioner
Sharon Riddick — Petitioner