Sharon Cammille Riddick v. Massachusetts
DueProcess Securities
Whether 8.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2) is an adequate basis to dismiss the Petitioner's Complaint, and not a violation of the Petitioner's First Amendment right to petition the government to redress grievances clause, as well as the Fifth Amendment the right to self incrimination and due process clauses?
questions presented are (1). Whether 8.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2), as amended, 434 Mass. 1801 (2001) is an adequate basis to dismiss the Petitioner’s Complaint, and not a violation of the Petitioner’s First Amendment right to petition the government to redress grievances clause, as well as the Fifth Amendment the right to self incrimination and due process clauses? ‘ (2).Whether dismissing and not enforcing Petitioner's . M.G.L., CH2, SEC.11, SEC.5 Interlocutory Appeal Into Single Justice, is an act of obstruction of justice by suppression of the Petitioner’s Court filings, a violation of the Petitioner’s Fourteenth Amendment due process clause? ;