No. 24-52

Gunes Biray v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-deference agency-discretion appellate-review arbitrary-and-capricious due-process sec-enforcement securities-law securities-regulation whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) possess absolute immunity from appellate scrutiny when it arbitrarily or capriciously denies whistleblower awards, particularly in instances where such rejections stem from the SEC's failure to adhere to its own established procedures, in defiance of Supreme Court precedents?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) possess absolute immunity from appellate scrutiny when it arbitrarily or capriciously denies whistleblower awards, particularly in instances where such rejections stem from the SEC's failure to adhere to its own established procedures, in defiance of Supreme Court precedents? (i)

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-07
Waiver of SEC of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent SEC to respond filed.
2024-04-25

Attorneys

Gunes Biray
Gunes Biray — Petitioner
SEC
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent